|
Arguments for the Existence of God
Aquinas' Five Ways Ontological arguments Design arguments Cosmological arguments Probability arguments Religious experience Philosophy of Religion
Recently added to the site
|
Arguments for the existence of God (Part 1): Introduction and DesignInformation: This is Part 1 of a review of various arguments for the existence of God. A version of this article was originally published on the website www.faithnet.org.uk. Introduction Arguments for the existence of God are an attempt to prove (or justify) God's existence by rational means, and are usually expressed in the form of, 'If this... then' statements. For example: If there is evidence for design in the world... then this is evidence for a designer (who is God). Arguments for the existence of God are often based on general revelation. This is the belief that there is evidence for God's existence from the way things are in the world. Arguments for the existence of God based on general revelation are also called natural theology. General revelation is to be contrasted with special revelation. Special revelation consists of knowledge God has specifically given to us about things, such as who God is, what God has done (or will do), and how God wants us to live. These ideas are usually found in various holy books (such as The Bible, Qur'an, Guru Granth Sahib etc.). Although natural theology (based on our reason) is said to be capable of demonstrating God's existence, many theologians feel it is incapable of doing anything more. For instance, natural theology is said to be incapable of telling us anything about who God is, or how God wants us to live. Muslims would not have known from the way the world is, that Allah wanted them to pray five times a day (Salah). This is something specifically revealed to them by Allah, through the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH). Furthermore, some say that in relying on our own thoughts and reasoning skills that there is a danger people might confuse their own ideas about who God is, with what God truly is. Popular arguments believers use to prove the existence of God The most popular arguments for the existence of God are:
Another argument is based on the phenomena (or existence) of religion, but this is not so much an argument for the existence of God as a challenge to people to explain why there is religion, if there is no God [1]. Arguments for the existence of God based on the appearance of design in the world
Those who believe God created the world are often called Creationists. Sometimes the notion of creationism is also linked to a specific idea of how God created the world (i.e. in six days). William Paley (1743-1805) set out what many people consider to be the classic design argument, in his watch analogy:
Paley's analogy suggests that complex and ordered things do not occur by chance. Instead, rather like the complex mechanism of a watch they have to have been made by someone, and for a specific reason. In the passage above, Paley is saying that because the world is complex and ordered (like a watch), that this could not have come about by chance, but must be the product of intelligent design. Something to discuss: Some Christians in the UK and USA believe intelligent design should be taught in schools as a fact, and as an alternative to naturalistic evolution (for more on this see 'Intelligent design' teaching ban, BBC News). What are your views on this? Advertisement
Evidence of design in the world and the universe
Some issues
The idea that God worked through the Big-bang and evolution to bring about life, is known as theistic evolution. One of the biggest challenges for theists who choose this option, is understanding the nature of religious texts which speak about creation. For instance, naturalistic evolution is based on the idea that life evolved over a period of millions of years, whereas the Bible seems to suggest that it occurred over a period of six days (144 hours). One of the biggest objections to design arguments is that if the world has been designed and made by God, then why do bad things happen? The point here being that if God had created the world, would not God have done a better job? Whatever we decide about this matter, one thing is known for sure - the odds of life being found on any planet in the universe, are huge. That there is any life on ours, is something many scientists still find hard to understand. So although we might not be happy to prove (or justify) God's existence on the basis of 'design' in the world, maybe God is required to explain why anything is here in the first place? Arguments for the existence of God (Part 2): Cosmological arguments Notes [1] Philosophers of religion class these arguments as a posteriori, or based on experience. Another argument known as The Ontological Argument is classed as a priori. This is an argument based on reason, and attempts to prove God's existence by logic. In other words, if a certain set of statements are true, then any conclusion we draw from them are said to also be true. [2] A theist is someone who believes God exists, and theism is the term we use to describe this belief. Therefore, a theistic religion is one which has as a central idea the belief that God exists. |

That Religious Studies Website
| Home | Religious Studies | Ethics | Video Lessons |
- Share:
Facebook
Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Stumbleupon


